Psychopathology II: Borderline States

Second Year Adult Psychoanalytic Training (APT)
2019-20, 3rd Trimester — Fridays, 3:30-5:00pm
Michael Pauly, MD


Introduction

Hello, and welcome to Psychopathology II: Borderline States.

Early analysts emphasized the fixed character structure of such “primitive” patients. It is my opinion that this fixed view is reductionistic and less clinically useful than a more flexible model whereby structures and defenses and emergent clinical phenomena are thought to be greatly influenced by the framing, containing, and holding capacities of the analytic situation and person of the analyst.

We will approach the affect-laden enveloping quality of the work with a focus on the developmental conditions and clinical manifestations of this psychopathology spectrum. This is rich, intricate, challenging, and at times uncomfortable work. Unbearable discomfort can lead to empathic failure and collapses of the space for thought on both sides of the relationship. We will emphasize how the analyst is affected by such patients, the various means by which disturbing experience is transmitted, and how these processes are a ubiquitous, inevitable, and potentially useful/reparative part of the analytic process.

Immersing oneself in the literature relevant to this psychopathology spectrum can lead to similar disorganizing affective states in the reader, accompanied by a reactive wish for a clearer more durable way of conceptualizing and organizing the material; a wish for more clarity where entropic disorganization often reigns. It is my hope that as a group we can cultivate the space to together metabolize the fragments and integrate the experience into a good-enough whole.

As you read through the articles for this class recall from psychopathology I Sugarman’s model for a neurotically organized mind consisting not of particular mental content but rather certain mental capacities (i.e. self-reflective capacity, capacity for affect regulation, capacity for narcissistic regulation, and internal conflict). We will make use of this to understand the struggles that characterize the phenomena that present in borderline states and states of narcissistic fragmentation / breakdown.

March 20, 2020 — Etiology

37 pages of reading.

We will begin with Fonagy, Mancia, and Winnicott to highlight the relational – etiological factors contributing to the emergence of these character / self-disorders.

Fonagy, P. (2000) Attachment and Borderline Personality Disorder, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. 48:1129-1146.

In Attachment and Borderline Personality, Peter Fonagy outlines how the caregivers’ reflective capacity impacts their child’s capacity for mentalization and the development of a secure attachment. He links these concepts with the idea that early trauma may result in a child’s inhibition of mentalization in an effort to avoid the pain of reflecting on their lived experience, thereby resulting in impaired reflective abilities and an impaired sense of self. Per Fonagy, these impairments may explain the link between childhood maltreatment and character pathology.

Mancia, M. (2006) “Implicit Memory and Early Unrepressed Unconscious: Their role in the Therapeutic Process (How Neuroscience Can Contribute to Psychoanalysis)” IJP, 87:83-103

In Implicit Memory and Early Unrepressed Unconscious…, Mauro Mancia proposes that that the affective pre-symbolic and pre-verbal experiences of the primary caregiver – infant relationship are stored in the implicit memory system and hence can be considered part of the unrepressed unconscious. He outlines how access to this material is present in the musical dimension of the transference and in dreams and that it is the analyst’s task to engage in a reconstruction of that which has been recorded but has yet to be thought / remembered.

March 27, 2020 — Etiology (continued)

23 pages of reading.

Winnicott, D.W. (1974) “Fear of Breakdown”, International Review of PSA, 1:103-107

Fear of Breakdown is a classic. In it Winnicott precociously captures what Mancia represents in neurobiological terms; that there is a storing in the implicit memory systems an awareness of lived events of past emotional overwhelm (primitive agonies) that have not been fully psychologically experienced and hence have not been thought about and hence haunt the person and at times present in treatment as a fear of breakdown. This paper and its concepts offer a foundational link to many papers that follow in this course.

Ogden, T.H. (2014) “Fear of Breakdown and the Unlived Life”, IJP, 95:205-223

Thomas Ogden walks us through Winnicott’s paper and Claire Winnicott offers an (optional) illustrative case. Please bring in clinical material of your own.

Optional Reading

Winnicott, C. (1980). Fear of Breakdown: A Clinical Example. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 61:351-357

April 3, 2020 — Conceptualization / Treatment Implications

44 pages of reading.

Socarides, D.D.; Stolorow, R.D. (1984) “Affects and Selfobjects” Ann. Psychoanal., 12:105-119

Socarides and Stolorow in Affects and Selfobjects, bring to our discussion of borderline and narcissistic fragmentation experiences the language of self-psychology and highlight the experience of affect modulation / tolerance. They propose that selfobject functions pertain fundamentally to the affective dimension of self-experience, and that the need for selfobjects pertains to the need for specific responses to varying affect states throughout development; responses that that allow for the differentiating, synthesizing, modulating, and cognitively articulating emergent emotional states and thereby to the overall experience of the “self”.

Robbins, M. (1996) “The Mental Organization of Primitive Personalities and its Treatment Implications”, JAPA, 44(3):755-784

In The Mental Organization of Primitive Personalities and its Treatment Implications, Michael Robbins encourages us to think of more primitive personalities as differing in qualitative rather than quantitative ways and that assumptive errors along these lines lead to technical approaches that may be regressive or promote what Winnicott described as an analysis with the false self.

Both articles propose analytic technique(s) stemming from their unique conceptualizations of mental organization / self-experience. How do these resonate with your experience? Please bring clinical material.

April 10, 2020 — Trauma

56 pages of reading.

McDougall, J. (1978) “Primitive Communication and the Use of Countertransference-Reflections on Early Psychic Trauma and its Transference Effects”, Contemp. Psychoanal., 14:173-209

Joyce McDougall provides us with ample clinical material to show the impact of traumatic experiences that occur in the preverbal period of development and to highlight how these early experiences present via route of the non-verbal expressions (think of Manica’s procedural memory system of unrepressed unconscious) affecting that analyst’s countertransference. She calls these primitive communications. Her paper speaks of the analytic process as helping to transform action-communications / action-symptoms into that which can be verbally represented in language, allowing containment of the experience.

Tuch, R.H. (2007) “Thinking with, and About, Patients too Scared to Think”, IJP, 88:91-111.

Richard Tuch adds to our discussion an emphasis on separation anxiety and the links of this to difficulties in reflective thought and an intolerance of being thought about by the (other) analyst. Although not referenced in this paper I encourage you to think back to the paper by Britton (Subjectivity, Objectivity, and Triangular Space), as it set the foundation for understanding the developmental experiences leading to the clinical struggles highlighted by Tuch’s article.

April 17, 2020 — Trauma (continued)

36 pages of reading.

This week we continue our focus on the deep and lasting impact of trauma.

Bromberg, P.M. (2003). One Need Not Be a House to Be Haunted: On Enactment, Dissociation, and the Dread of “Not-Me”—A Case Study. Psychoanal. Dial., 13(5):689-709.

Phillip Bromberg in One need not be a house to be haunted: a case study, highlights how psychic trauma exceeds the capacity for cognitive processing, thereby leading to unintegratable affect that at times disorganizes the internal template on which self-coherence, self-cohesiveness, and self-continuity depend. He beautifully depicts how having affective memory without autobiographical memory leads to dissociated not me experiences that haunt the self (think back to Fear of Breakdown).

Brown, L. (2006) “Julie’s Museum: The evolution of thinking, dreaming and historicization in the treatment of traumatized patients” IJP, 87:1569-1585

Lawrence Brown, in Julie’s Museum: The Evolution of Thinking, Dreaming, and Historicization In the Treatment of Traumatized Patients, complements and extends Bromberg’s paper by linking trauma’s destruction of one’s internal thinking-containing capacity with the concretization of thought. His clinical example highlights the importance in these cases of the analyst’s imaginative capacity being crucial for helping their patients begin to think and dream, and to free themselves from the mental captivity of concrete thought. How do you share your imaginative capacity with your patients?

April 24, 2020 — Reflective Collapse and Relationship to Violence and Suicide

28 pages of reading.

Fonagy, P. Target, M. (1995). Understanding The Violent Patient: The Use Of The Body And The Role Of The Father. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 76:487-501

Peter Fonagy, in Understanding the Violent Patient: The Use of the Body and the Role of the Father, presents the case of Mr. T to highlight the role of violence as an attempt to obliterate intolerable psychic experience (impaired mentalizing capacity) and to make, albeit pathological, an attempt at finding a containing self-organization. He makes important connections of violence to the experience of a fragile self, the role of the body as a representation of the hated other, the importance developmentally of the father in facilitating separation and offering a new connection, and lastly provides his advice with respect to technique in treating this population.

Maltsberger, J.T. (2004). The descent into suicide. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 85(3):653-667.

John Maltsberger, in The Decent Into Suicide, discusses the factors leading to suicidal collapse (affective flooding, desperate maneuvers to counter the emerging mental emergency, loss of control as the self begins to disintegrate, and grandiose mental scheming for mental survival) and connects these with the difficulties in the realm of affect regulation, ego helplessness, narcissistic surrender, breakdown of the representational world, and loss of reality testing.

May 1, 2020 — Hatred and Destruction and a Movement towards the New

26 pages of reading.

Winnicott, D.W. (1969) The Use of an Object. IJP, 50:711-716.

Donald Winnicott’s paper The Use of an Object deserves to be read many times over. In it he introduces his distinction between object relating and object usage. He walks the reader through the transition from object relating to object usage (the capacity of which is determined by an adequate facilitating environment). The transition requires the placing of the object outside of the subject’s omnipotent control. Failure to make this transition can explain many areas of difficulty in this population (separation-individuation, narcissistic rage, capacities to empathize / love, stability of interpersonal relationships, acceptance of external reality).

Kathleen White in Surviving Hatred and Being Hated: Some Personal Thoughts About Racism from a Psychoanalytic Perspective, brings a discussion of the experience of being the object (as a result of one’s race) of toxic attributions and projections. She highlights the subsequent response(s): the self-hatred stemming from the internalization and identification with such projections; and the emergence of the hatred of the other. She stresses that hatred is learned and that the analytic endeavor must include helping patients recover the learning process in hateful experiences so that unlearning and relearning is possible. Please bring in accounts of any experiences (personal or professional) this paper stimulates in you.

May 8, 2020 — Narcissistic Vulnerability and Treatment Implications

28 pages of reading.

The following two papers contain key frameworks for understanding the enactments that arise in working with narcissistically-sensitive, highly defended individuals.

Bateman, A. (1998) Thick-Skinned Organizations and Enactment in Borderline and Narcissistic Disorders. IJP, 79:13-25.

Alex Bateman, in Thick-Skinned Organizations and Enactment in Borderline and Narcissistic Disorders, proposes that narcissistic and borderline individuals move between thick and thin- skinned positions, lending an instability to the clinical picture which is both a danger and an opportunity for the treatment. He helpfully uses clinical material to outline his impression of the three countertransference experiences contributing to enactment (complementary, concordant, and defensive) and to highlight three levels of enactment (collusive, defensive, and the un-named role of father, corrective). The last he feels serves as a new helpful developmental experience that moves the treatment forward.

Steiner, J. (1994) Patient-Centered and Analyst-Centered Interpretations: Some Implications of Containment and Countertransference. Psychoanal. Inq., 14:406-422.

John Steiner’s, Patient-Centered and Analyst-Centered Interpretations, offers a new way of thinking about the subject of interpretation to shift from patient to analyst and allow for important communication between the analyst and their patient without provoking a defensive withdrawal or rejection. Does Steiner’s approach make sense to you? If so, have you made an effort to approach interpretive communication this way and with what affect?

May 15, 2020 — Hysteria / Psychosomatic States

28 pages of reading.

This course would be incomplete without making connections between early life trauma, deficits in the capacity to mentalize / symbolically represent and reflect on internal psychic experience, and the expression of psychic phenomena through bodily experience and / or illness.

Weinreb, A. (2010) Healing the Split Between Body and Mind: Structural and Developmental Aspects of Psychosomatic Illness. Psychoanal. Inquiry. 30(5):430-444

Anita Weinreb in, Healing the Split Between Body and Mind: Structural and Developmental Aspects of Psychosomatic Illness, follows the analytic journey of two women with multiple somatic problems. They discover and examine how their bodies became the vehicle into which unprocessed feelings had been emptied and how with treatment helped them to develop the ability to verbally represent their experience, contain it, and reflect upon it, thereby revealing the underlying conflicts and functions embedded in their previous somatic expression.

Kohutis, E.A. (2010) Concreteness, Metaphor, and Psychosomatic Disorders: Bridging the Gap. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 30(5):416-429

Eileen Kohutis in, Concreteness, Metaphor, and Psychosomatic Disorders: Bridging the Gap, highlights the frustration that can arise in working with the concreteness that often accompanies somatic expressions of psychic phenomena. Please bring in your experiences of working with psychosomatic expressions of psychic experience.

May 22, 2020 — Perverse Mechanisms

62 pages of reading.

The last two weeks of this course are dedicated to the exploration of perverse mechanisms, within which sadomasochism resides. While somewhat heavy on the reading, my hope is that given the difficulty engaging, surviving, and proving helpful to this character type the time spent is worthwhile.

Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond Doer and Done to: An Intersubjective View of Thirdness. Psychoanal Q., 73(1):5-46.

Jessica Benjamin, in Beyond Doer and Done To, is a must read and speaks directly to the developmental contributors and interpersonal struggles that present when an individual has been unable to recognize the other as a subjective other (think back to Winnicott). The result is a failure of what she calls a shared third that results in an endless power struggle with a drastically impaired capacity for collaboration and sharing (true togetherness); a world where everything is mine or yours, including the perception of reality. This struggle inevitably becomes a centerpiece of the transference-countertransference experience. Please bring examples from your work.

Bach, S. (1994) The Language of Perversion and The Language of Love. London: Aronson. Ch1 “Sadomasochistic Object Relations”, pp3-25.

Sheldon Bach’s chapter, Sadomasochistic Object Relations, I think is invaluable in terms of working with sado-masochistically organized individuals. The chapter draws on many of the themes described in articles earlier in the course (difficulties in the realms of separation- individuation, developmental trauma, role of aggression, inability to mourn, narcissistic omnipotence, failures of seeing the other as separate, concrete mental processes) to explain the developmental line of perverse relating and guide the treatment approach.

May 29, 2020 — Perverse Mechanisms (continued)

42 pages of reading.

Tuch, R. (2010) Murder on the Mind: Tyrannical Power and other Points Along the Perverse Spectrum. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 91:141-162.

Richard Tuch, in Murder on the Mind: Tyrannical Power and other Points Along the Perverse Spectrum, gives comprehensive overview of the history of thinking about perversion and perverse relatedness.

Nos, J.P. (2014) Collusive Induction in Perverse Relating: Perverse Enactments and Bastions as a Camouflage for Death Anxiety. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 95:291-311.

In Collusive Induction in Perverse Relating… Jamie Nos speaks directly to the experience of working analytically with people with perverse character structure (i.e. an emergence in the work of a pressure to pervert the analytic process) as well as perverse character serving the function of defending against death anxiety (think of Winnicott’s primitive agonies and object relating vs object usage). He stresses the essential role of the analyst taking a second look at their inevitable collusive participation in disavowal.

Considerations For Further Reading

Briggs, S. Goldblatt, M.J. Lindner, R. Maltsberger, J.T. Fiedler, G. (2012). Suicide and trauma: A case discussion. Psychoanal. Psychother., 26(1):13-33

Kernberg, O.F. (2003). The Management of Affect Storms in the Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy of Borderline Patients. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 51(2):517-544.

Frosch, A. (2012) “Absolute Truth and Unbearable Psychic Pain: Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Concrete Experience”, London: Karnac. Introduction, pages xix-xxiv.

Britton, R. (2004). Subjectivity, Objectivity, and Triangular Space. Psychoanal Q., 73(1):47-61.

Kernberg, O.F. (1985) “The Subjective Experience of Emptiness” Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. Jason Aronson (213-224).

Anderson, M.K. (1999). The Pressure Toward Enactment and the Hatred of Reality. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 47(2):503-518.

Anderson, M. (2012) “Concreteness, reflective thought and the emissary function of the dream.” Absolute Truth and Unbearable Psychic Pain: Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Concrete Experience. A Frosch, ed. London: Karnac. Chapter 1, pp.1-16.

Ghent, E. (1990). Masochism, Submission, Surrender—Masochism as a Perversion of Surrender. Contemp. Psychoanal., 26:108-136.

Coen, S.J. (2005). How to Play with Patients who Would Rather Remain Remote. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 53(3):811-834.

Stein, R. (2005). Why perversion? ‘False love’ and the perverse pact. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 86(3):775-799.

McDougall, J. (1980) “A Child is Being Eaten—I: Psychosomatic States, Anxiety Neurosis and Hysteria—a Theoretical Approach II: The Abysmal Mother and the Cork Child – A Clinical Illustration” Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 16: 417-459.

Gabbard, G.O. (1991). Technical Approaches to Transference Hate in the Analysis of Borderline Patients. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 72:625-636.

Eaton, J.L. (2005). The Obstructive Object. Psychoanal. Rev., 92(3):355-372.

Caligor, E. Diamond, D. Yeomans, F.E. Kernberg, O.F. (2009). The Interpretive Process in the Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy of Borderline Personality Pathology. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 57(2):271-301.

Blechner, M.J. (2009). Erotic and Antierotic Transference. Contemp. Psychoanal., 45(1):82-92.

Geist, R.A. (2011). The Forward Edge, Connectedness, and the Therapeutic Process. Int. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 6(2):235-251.

Akhtar, S. (1996). “Someday . . ” And “If Only . . ” Fantasies: Pathological Optimism And Inordinate Nostalgia As Related Forms Of Idealization. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 44:723-753.

Davies, J.M. Frawley, M.G. (1992). Dissociative Processes and Transference-Countertransference Paradigms in the Psychoanalytically Oriented Treatment of Adult Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse. Psychoanal. Dial., 2(1):5-36.